Updated pidgin packages fix security vulnerability
Publication date: 05 Jul 2016Modification date: 05 Jul 2016
Type: security
Affected Mageia releases : 5
CVE: CVE-2016-2376 , CVE-2016-2377 , CVE-2016-2378 , CVE-2016-2380 , CVE-2016-4323 , CVE-2016-2365 , CVE-2016-2366 , CVE-2016-2367 , CVE-2016-2368 , CVE-2016-2369 , CVE-2016-2370 , CVE-2016-2371 , CVE-2016-2372 , CVE-2016-2373 , CVE-2016-2374 , CVE-2016-2375
Description
A buffer overflows vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in arbitrary code execution. A malicious server or an attacker who intercepts the network traffic can send an invalid size for a packet which will trigger a buffer overflow (CVE-2016-2376). A buffer vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent by the server could potentially result in an out of bounds write of one byte. A malicious server can send a negative content-length in response to a HTTP request triggering the vulnerability (CVE-2016-2377). A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol Pidgin. Specially crafted data sent via the server could potentially result in a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in memory corruption. A malicious server or an unfiltered malicious user can send negative length values to trigger this vulnerability (CVE-2016-2378). An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent to the server could potentially result in an out of bounds read. A user could be convinced to enter a particular string which would then get converted incorrectly and could lead to a potential out-of-bounds read (CVE-2016-2380). A directory traversal exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in an overwrite of files. A malicious server or someone with access to the network traffic can provide an invalid filename for a splash image triggering the vulnerability (CVE-2016-4323). A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in a null pointer dereference. A malicious server or an attacker who intercepts the network traffic can send invalid data to trigger this vulnerability and cause a crash (CVE-2016-2365). A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or an attacker who intercepts the network traffic can send invalid data to trigger this vulnerability and cause a crash (CVE-2016-2366). An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out of bounds read. A malicious user, server, or man-in-the-middle can send an invalid size for an avatar which will trigger an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. This could result in a denial of service or copy data from memory to the file, resulting in an information leak if the avatar is sent to another user (CVE-2016-2367). Multiple memory corruption vulnerabilities exist in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could result in multiple buffer overflows, potentially resulting in code execution or memory disclosure (CVE-2016-2368). An NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in a denial of service vulnerability. A malicious server can send a packet starting with a NULL byte triggering the vulnerability (CVE-2016-2369). A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or man-in-the-middle can send invalid data to trigger this vulnerability (CVE-2016-2370). An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could cause memory corruption resulting in code execution (CVE-2016-2371). An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out of bounds read. A malicious user, server, or man-in-the-middle can send an invalid size for a file transfer which will trigger an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. This could result in a denial of service or copy data from memory to the file, resulting in an information leak if the file is sent to another user (CVE-2016-2372). A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or user can send an invalid mood to trigger this vulnerability (CVE-2016-2373). An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT MultiMX message sent via the server can result in an out-of-bounds write leading to memory disclosure and code execution (CVE-2016-2374). An exploitable out-of-bounds ready exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT contact information sent from the server can result in memory disclosure (CVE-2016-2375). The pidgin package has been updated to version 2.11.0, which fixes these issues and other bugs, including authentication for the AIM protocol.
References
- https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18754
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0118
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0119
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0120
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0123
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0128
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0133
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0134
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0135
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0136
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0137
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0138
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0139
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0140
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0141
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0142
- http://www.talosintel.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0143
- https://bitbucket.org/pidgin/www/src/tip/htdocs/ChangeLog?fileviewer=file-view-default
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2376
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2377
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2378
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2380
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-4323
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2365
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2366
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2367
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2368
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2369
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2370
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2371
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2372
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2373
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2374
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2375
SRPMS
5/core
- pidgin-2.11.0-1.mga5